The Actual Wolf of Wallstreet Cold Call Script
The article analyzes Stratton Oakmont's sales script, highlighting its directness, engagement techniques, and effective phrases like "fair enough?" while cautioning against illegal practices and traditional cold call methods.
Read original articleThe article discusses the sales script used by Stratton Oakmont, famously associated with Jordan Belfort, known as the "Wolf of Wall Street." The firm, which operated as an over-the-counter brokerage in the late 80s and 90s, became notorious for defrauding investors but was also recognized for its effective sales techniques. The script emphasizes a direct approach, starting with a clear introduction and a pattern interrupt to capture the prospect's attention. It includes strategies for handling objections and qualifying leads early in the conversation. Key phrases like "fair enough?" are highlighted as powerful tools in negotiations. The article also advises against using overly familiar cold call openings, suggesting a more personalized approach instead. While acknowledging the illegal activities of Stratton Oakmont, it reflects on the allure of their sales success and the lessons that can be learned from their methods.
- Stratton Oakmont's sales script is known for its directness and effectiveness.
- The script includes techniques for engaging prospects and handling objections.
- Key phrases like "fair enough?" are considered powerful in negotiations.
- The article advises against traditional cold call openings in favor of personalized approaches.
- Despite its success, Stratton Oakmont's practices were illegal and should not be emulated.
Related
New technology and old tactics have made buying a car a death march of deception
The article exposes car dealerships' deceptive tactics, illustrated by Mario Flores' experience at CardinaleWay Mazda. Jase Patrick's intervention reveals industry practices, FTC's CARS rule, and NADA's opposition, emphasizing consumer protection efforts.
Stop Offering Me Amazon Gift Cards
The author criticizes SaaS companies for sending unsolicited emails offering Amazon gift cards for service discussions, citing ethical concerns, potential backlash, and negative company image. They advocate for ending this practice.
Bad Trades Are Also Valuable
Making successful trades in the financial market involves predicting asset value increases. Traders can profit by buying appreciating assets and selling them at higher prices. Skilled traders can monetize this ability through investment newsletters or hedge funds, charging fees for insights. Replicating successful trades poses risks.
"Authentic" is dead. And so is "is dead."
Jason Cohen critiques overused marketing phrases like "authentic" and "game-changing," urging for specificity and concrete examples in communication. He encourages innovation and fresh ideas over clichés in writing and marketing.
Leveraged buyouts are not like mortgages
The article critiques leveraged buyouts as deceptive practices that exploit companies, emphasizing the role of private equity firms in asset stripping and the obfuscation of their actions through financial jargon.
- Many commenters express skepticism about the effectiveness and ethics of cold calling, viewing it as manipulative or a scam.
- Some individuals share personal experiences, highlighting the emotional challenges and rejection faced in sales roles.
- There is a recognition of the psychological aspects of sales, with some admiring the skills of successful salespeople while others find the tactics off-putting.
- Several comments critique the portrayal of sales in media, particularly in relation to the glamorization of unethical practices.
- Overall, there is a divide between those who see value in sales techniques and those who reject them as morally questionable.
Most people, about 95% making these first calls never make it higher. Either they quickly gather this job is a BS scam or they're too stupid to realize that and that stupidity often prevents them from going higher up. A few cynical ones like the manipulative aspects of it.
The job of a firm is to create illusion of excessive wealth and rockstar lifestyle of these "brokers" (strippers, cocaine, etc.) to attract some kind of talent. Most of the directors are faking the size of their wealth. E.g. coming to job on rented Bentley. They also lie about the nature of the job to hire people for "canvassing" as it doesn't matter how long you stay, if you only deliver 20 leads per first day and quit that's still a win. A bulk of the leads come from people who were tricked into the job and quit asap.
Most people who make it through are the ones cynical enough to stay around, then they harvest work of the ones who quit earlier. E.g. you collect leads, small clients etc. I have a friend who made it far, his lifestyle was just like Wolf of Wallstreet but more excessive. That movie btw. it's watered down - which is hard to believe for most as you'd expect Hollywood to overblow things.
I do think it's good to be polite to anyone who calls, but it doesn't matter what they say or ask, the answer is always a polite "Please don't call me again."
The sales script doesn’t seem to have anything nefarious really. Just some tactics to keep the call going and typical early sales qualification to move a prospect to the next stage of a pipeline or out of the pipeline. Typical SDR/BDR work. I’d assume what’s said in later stages is more juicy.
The mildly interesting insight to me is how the call starts with trying to get the prospect to schedule a follow up using an incentive (the market report), before getting into the qualifying questions, which are meant to determine if the prospect is going to be a match for the offer. It makes sense from the standpoint you really want another call scheduled so you don’t get their voicemail and you might lose the opportunity to schedule that later in the call.
I wish the author added text from the actual sale past the qualification stage, but I’m guessing that wasn’t really scripted.
I am fascinated by employees I've had who love cold calling and are great at it. They are even energised by it! Most have a mirror in their cube smile on your call and the other person can hear it through the phone). One thing about all of them I've spoken with: they are certain that the person they're calling needs our product (and if not they're happy to get off the phone as quickly as possible so they can call someone else). Maybe the Stratton Oakmont sales folks thought that, though my impression was that instead they saw the callee as a sheep to be shorn.
I am astonished at people who can just make a friend or at least an interesting connection while waiting in line for the bathroom.
_This opener feels less salesy, and is actually the reason why you called._
I wonder what does it feel to work in an industry where your main goal is to convince other people you are not a part of it.
Each time, I reminded myself that I lack the emotional fortitude to take the amount of rejection sales people get. I am too vested and convinced "left brain" person to be able to understand then accept rejection. The thing I am pitching makes perfect logical sense to me.
Basically, to be in sales, specially cold calling, one must have very, very thick skin, and ignore the majority rejection.
Not even a little bit. I hate calling people that are expecting my call, and I could never get over selling something I knew was bogus, even for a ton of money.
They definitely work. Listed total strangers after a phone call. Remember it's a % game. If you call 30 people might get 20 angry no's, 5 friendly no's, 3 so so leads and 2 hot leads.
It seems the sales industry would benefit from considering the possibility of heterogeneous effects. I can see these techniques working for some, but they are off-putting for me and are a great way to get immediately blocked.
Stuff like this is like... bait, right?
some people, and a lot of them in corporate envs when they buy something, they like the excitement of spending the money, but they want the feel like it was taken from them, and that they aren't responsible for it going wrong. they want the excitement without the responsibility, literally to be seduced.
nobody wants the truth, the risks, details, or anything real, they want a story that lets them press the money button without judgment or blowback, and that's what most sales are. I'm too neurotic for it and make a living doing other things, and tech people bitch about sales and marketing all the time, but as an art, I respect and appreciate it.
Working from the hypothesis that people generally don't have seconds they are willing to give away to anyone who calls, but they are busy to varying degrees.
And was I supposed to like the main character? In any way, shape or form? I feel I can relate more to full-fledged anti-heroes like Walter White or The Wire's Omar than I can to this basic jackass.
Gross.
Related
New technology and old tactics have made buying a car a death march of deception
The article exposes car dealerships' deceptive tactics, illustrated by Mario Flores' experience at CardinaleWay Mazda. Jase Patrick's intervention reveals industry practices, FTC's CARS rule, and NADA's opposition, emphasizing consumer protection efforts.
Stop Offering Me Amazon Gift Cards
The author criticizes SaaS companies for sending unsolicited emails offering Amazon gift cards for service discussions, citing ethical concerns, potential backlash, and negative company image. They advocate for ending this practice.
Bad Trades Are Also Valuable
Making successful trades in the financial market involves predicting asset value increases. Traders can profit by buying appreciating assets and selling them at higher prices. Skilled traders can monetize this ability through investment newsletters or hedge funds, charging fees for insights. Replicating successful trades poses risks.
"Authentic" is dead. And so is "is dead."
Jason Cohen critiques overused marketing phrases like "authentic" and "game-changing," urging for specificity and concrete examples in communication. He encourages innovation and fresh ideas over clichés in writing and marketing.
Leveraged buyouts are not like mortgages
The article critiques leveraged buyouts as deceptive practices that exploit companies, emphasizing the role of private equity firms in asset stripping and the obfuscation of their actions through financial jargon.