August 8th, 2024

Molecule restores cognition, memory in Alzheimer's disease model mice

UCLA researchers discovered DDL-920, a molecule that enhances cognitive functions in Alzheimer's model mice by increasing gamma oscillations, showing improved memory recall without side effects and potential for other neurological conditions.

Read original articleLink Icon
Molecule restores cognition, memory in Alzheimer's disease model mice

UCLA researchers have identified a molecule, DDL-920, that has shown promise in restoring cognitive functions in mice exhibiting symptoms of Alzheimer's disease. Unlike existing FDA-approved treatments that primarily focus on removing harmful brain plaques, DDL-920 aims to enhance the brain's memory circuitry by increasing gamma oscillations, which are crucial for cognitive processes. The study, published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, involved administering DDL-920 to genetically modified mice over two weeks. The treated mice demonstrated improved memory recall in a maze test, performing similarly to healthy mice, without any adverse side effects. The researchers believe that if DDL-920 proves effective in humans, it could also have applications for other conditions associated with diminished gamma oscillations, such as depression and schizophrenia. The study's lead author, Dr. Istvan Mody, emphasized the novelty of this approach, which targets specific neurons to enhance cognitive function rather than merely addressing plaque accumulation.

- UCLA researchers developed DDL-920, a molecule that restores cognitive functions in Alzheimer's model mice.

- DDL-920 enhances gamma oscillations, crucial for memory, unlike current treatments that only remove brain plaques.

- Mice treated with DDL-920 showed improved memory recall without side effects.

- The compound may have potential applications for other neurological conditions like depression and schizophrenia.

- Further research is needed to assess the safety and efficacy of DDL-920 in humans.

Link Icon 11 comments
By @robwwilliams - 2 months
The fundamental problem of the great majority of so-called “in mice” studies is their use of exactly 1 (one) fully inbred type of mouse — C57BL/6J. Would you trust N=1 clinical trials?

In this particular PNAS study you have to be hard-core reader and rummage around in the Methods section to uncover this awkward detail:

“Mouse strains used were C57BL/6J (Black 6, Jackson Laboratory; JAX stock #000664), JAX stock #003725 (Gabrd−/− mice on a C57BL/6J background…”

No wonder translation fails so often. It is not the mice, it is scientists cutting corners!

Some of us working with mice use many different genotypes of mice to ensure somewhat more robust results that have a better chance to generalize across mouse genomes and perhaps even human populations.

This is not new news. Here is a classic on this topic in Alzheimer’s research published in Neuron in 2019:

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30595332/

One more point: There is a great deal of variation in expression of key genes/proteins mentions in this recent PNAS study, in particular parvalbumin and the GABA receptors.

For example parvalbumin protein levels in the hippocampus of different strains of mice at different ages vary over a 20-fold range. Here are the hard data from GeneNetwork.org;

https://genenetwork.org/show_trait?trait_id=61839_VFHILDKDKS...

And GABA receptors also have high levels of variation in hippocampus and other brain regions. Here is a good paper that compares mouse and human GABA receptor variation.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22506031/

By @amluto - 2 months
It can join this one: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26439832/

The obvious major caveat is that mice are not people, and that mouse models of what someone thinks are Alzheimer’s-like diseases are not people with Alzheimer’s.

By @londons_explore - 2 months
I do wonder if medicine would do better if we simply skipped the efficacy tests in animals (due to the very low accuracy of animal models of diseases not well understood) and simply did animal safety tests, then moved straight onto human trials.

Obviously the vast majority of treatments would be ineffective - and this in turn should let you design multi-treatment trials, where say a trial of 100 patients are used to test 50 substances, with each person receiving simultaneously tiny doses of ~25 candidate treatments.

Then the patient outcomes are used to identify which of the 50 likely have some effect, and a trial is done of just that substance.

By @mbStavola - 2 months
Getting ahead of the "in mice" meme replies, it is nice to see further developments in the search for a cure.
By @RivieraKid - 2 months
Alzheon's ALZ-801 pill should be approved within a year and should be basically an Alzheimer cure for 15% (current phase 3 trial) and later 2 thirds of people.

I've recently learned about this and was surprised it's somewhat under the radar. Am I missing something?

By @engine_y - 2 months
Thanks for having 'in model mice' in the header.

Unfortunately mice disease models have not been showing efficacy in humans.

By @gilleain - 2 months
From the paper :https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39106304

edit: ok apologies, after several attempts

http://www.chemspider.com/Chemical-Structure.24670873.html

3-(2-Naphthylmethyl)-4-(4-piperidinyl)-1H-pyrazol-1-ol

(incorrect stuff removed ...)

By @trhway - 2 months
>Auditory, visual or transcranial magnetic stimulation at a frequency of 40 Hz – similar to the frequency of a cat’s purr – worked to dissolve plaques in the brain but again did not show notable cognitive enhancements, Mody said.

my fascination with cats just got even bigger :) One can wonder whether having a cat would prevent/slow the plagues accumulation to start with.

By @harles - 2 months
I love that “in mice” is in the title (both on HN and in the original article). It seems like a promising result and I really appreciate them not over hyping it.
By @Beijinger - 2 months
"Wei et al., have studied the subunit composition of γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptors responsible for the tonic inhibition of parvalbumin positive interneurons and identified a small molecule (DDL-920) as a potent, efficacious, and selective negative allosteric modulator of these receptors."

A SMALL molecule? And not formula? Odd.

By @xpl - 2 months
How did they induce Alzheimer's in a mouse to begin with? I thought we still do not understand the causes, so how could they possibly do that?