FTC Outlines Concerns After Jury Finds Google Illegally Monopolized App Store
The FTC filed an amicus brief in the Epic Games v. Google antitrust case, advocating for remedies to restore competition and prevent Google from benefiting from its monopolistic practices.
Read original articleThe Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has filed an amicus brief in the ongoing antitrust case Epic Games Inc. v. Google LLC, where a jury found Google liable for illegally monopolizing its app store. The FTC's brief emphasizes the need for effective remedies that not only halt Google's illegal conduct but also restore competition in the digital marketplace. It argues that any injunctive relief should prevent Google from benefiting from its monopolistic practices and should consider the unique characteristics of digital markets, such as network effects and data feedback loops. Google has raised concerns about the feasibility and burden of complying with potential remedies, but the FTC asserts that these concerns should not excuse the need for compliance. The Commission's vote to file the brief was 3-0-2, with two commissioners recused due to prior involvement in related cases. The FTC aims to ensure that monopolists do not escape the consequences of their actions, which have harmed millions of users.
- The FTC filed an amicus brief in the Epic Games v. Google antitrust case.
- The brief calls for remedies that restore competition and prevent Google from benefiting from its illegal monopolization.
- Google has expressed concerns about the burden of compliance with potential remedies.
- The FTC emphasizes that compliance costs are not a valid excuse for monopolistic behavior.
- The Commission's vote to file the brief was 3-0-2, with two commissioners recused.
Related
Google begs court for relief from Epic Games' Play Store demands
Google resists Epic Games' Play Store changes in court, citing high costs and security risks. Epic seeks third-party store access, porting support, and Google Play distribution. Ongoing legal battle over alleged Google Play monopoly.
Google loses antitrust suit over search deals on phones
Google lost a major antitrust lawsuit by the DOJ, with a ruling that its $26 billion payments for default search engine status were anti-competitive, potentially increasing regulatory scrutiny on tech companies.
Google loses antitrust lawsuit over its search dominance
A federal judge declared Google a monopolist in its search business, citing antitrust violations. The ruling may lead to penalties and impacts Google's contracts, affecting its AI development and competition.
Google's online search monopoly is illegal, US judge rules
A US judge ruled that Google illegally maintains a monopoly in online search, potentially leading to penalties or a breakup. Google plans to appeal, citing service quality over anti-competitive practices.
All the possible ways to destroy Google's monopoly in search
US District Judge Amit Mehta ruled that Google has a monopoly in search and advertising, prompting potential DOJ remedies. Google plans to appeal, asserting its search quality and user trust.
Related
Google begs court for relief from Epic Games' Play Store demands
Google resists Epic Games' Play Store changes in court, citing high costs and security risks. Epic seeks third-party store access, porting support, and Google Play distribution. Ongoing legal battle over alleged Google Play monopoly.
Google loses antitrust suit over search deals on phones
Google lost a major antitrust lawsuit by the DOJ, with a ruling that its $26 billion payments for default search engine status were anti-competitive, potentially increasing regulatory scrutiny on tech companies.
Google loses antitrust lawsuit over its search dominance
A federal judge declared Google a monopolist in its search business, citing antitrust violations. The ruling may lead to penalties and impacts Google's contracts, affecting its AI development and competition.
Google's online search monopoly is illegal, US judge rules
A US judge ruled that Google illegally maintains a monopoly in online search, potentially leading to penalties or a breakup. Google plans to appeal, citing service quality over anti-competitive practices.
All the possible ways to destroy Google's monopoly in search
US District Judge Amit Mehta ruled that Google has a monopoly in search and advertising, prompting potential DOJ remedies. Google plans to appeal, asserting its search quality and user trust.