August 13th, 2024

5G from AT&T and Verizon turns out to be Europe-level bad

Recent Opensignal data shows AT&T and Verizon's 5G availability at 11.7% and 7.7%, respectively, while T-Mobile leads at 67.9%. Poor performance is linked to spectrum choices and fewer mobile sites.

Read original articleLink Icon
5G from AT&T and Verizon turns out to be Europe-level bad

Recent data from Opensignal reveals that 5G services from AT&T and Verizon are significantly underperforming, with availability scores of just 11.7% and 7.7%, respectively. In contrast, T-Mobile leads with a score of 67.9%. The report highlights that these availability figures reflect the percentage of time users can connect to 5G in frequently visited locations, rather than geographic coverage. Analysts attribute the poor performance of AT&T and Verizon to their reliance on C-band spectrum, which, while expensive, is not ideal for providing robust coverage. T-Mobile's advantage stems from its use of 2.5GHz spectrum, which offers better propagation characteristics. The report also notes that the U.S. has fewer mobile sites per capita compared to countries like China and Japan, exacerbating coverage issues. Despite the low 5G availability, AT&T and Verizon maintain high overall mobile availability rates, but their 5G performance could hinder their competitive positioning. Verizon's strategy, which initially focused on millimeter wave spectrum, has also contributed to its struggles. The findings suggest that while U.S. telcos have invested heavily in 5G, the results have not met expectations, leading to comparisons with European operators who have similarly low availability rates.

- AT&T and Verizon's 5G availability is significantly lower than T-Mobile's.

- Poor performance is linked to reliance on C-band spectrum, which is less effective for coverage.

- T-Mobile's use of 2.5GHz spectrum provides better connectivity.

- The U.S. has fewer mobile sites per capita compared to leading countries.

- Low 5G availability may impact customer retention and competitive positioning for AT&T and Verizon.

Link Icon 8 comments
By @1xdevnet - 2 months
I've had Verizon's "Home Internet" service for a year or so in middle America. The 4G and 5G signal strength roughly match and aside from a few initial reboot issues - resolved by firmware updates - it's had rock solid speed. I just ran a few tests from librespeed.org:

  ╔═════════════╦════════════════╦══════════╦════════╦════════╦══════════╦═════════╗
  ║  Location   ║    Provider    ║ Protocol ║  Ping  ║ Jitter ║   Down   ║    Up   ║
  ╠═════════════╬════════════════╬══════════╬════════╬════════╬══════════╬═════════╣
  ║ Chicago     ║ Sharktech      ║ IPv4     ║  60 ms ║  15 ms ║ 408 Mbps ║ 23 Mbps ║
  ║ Atlanta     ║ Cloudiver      ║ IPv6     ║  67 ms ║   8 ms ║ 311 Mbps ║ 23 Mbps ║
  ║ Amsterdam   ║ "Rust backend" ║ IPv4     ║ 169 ms ║ 260 ms ║  68 Mbps ║ 20 Mbps ║
  ║ Nuremberg   ║ Hetzner        ║ IPv6     ║ 155 ms ║ 125 ms ║ 132 Mbps ║ 20 Mbps ║
  ║ Los Angeles ║ Sharktech      ║ IPv4     ║  86 ms ║  15 ms ║ 373 Mbps ║ 21 Mbps ║
  ║ Serbia      ║ SOX            ║ IPv6     ║ 188 ms ║  29 ms ║ 173 Mbps ║ 17 Mbps ║
  ║ Tokyo       ║ A573           ║ IPv4     ║ 183 ms ║  72 ms ║ 156 Mbps ║ 22 Mbps ║
  ╚═════════════╩════════════════╩══════════╩════════╩════════╩══════════╩═════════╝
I wouldn't say it's "decrepit", but maybe I'm just lucky.
By @voidwtf - 2 months
Does OpenSignal have details explaining how they collected this data? Could there be differences in the way these networks manage cellular connections, such as not utilizing 5G when 4G would save battery and/or provide a better signal.

I've noticed my device, an iPhone 13 Pro Max, will stay on LTE until I start downloading or streaming something. Then it will switch to 5g ultra wideband.

By @BigParm - 2 months
They develop 5G which is allegedly good for up to 10 GB/s. Then they throttle your speeds to exactly what they were on 4G. Maybe they can serve more customers in densely populated areas, but I'll never get to see a difference anyways.
By @blinded - 2 months
I have a 5g router for backup internet. works great get like 30 down and 5 up. ama. google fi ftw.
By @ITwork2019 - 2 months
WTH does europe-level bad mean!?
By @nadis - 2 months
"On '5G availability,' T-Mobile resembles an Usain Bolt alongside the decrepit fun runners of AT&T and Verizon, scoring 67.9%. AT&T limps over the line below 12%, while Verizon collapses on it at 7.7%." -- what a quote!

I'm disappointed, but not especially surprised.

By @Gelob - 2 months
t-mobile 5g is the worst. its slow as shit compared to at&t