August 16th, 2024

America prepares for a new nuclear-arms race

The U.S. is preparing for a potential nuclear arms race due to simultaneous threats from Russia, China, and North Korea, with a nuclear build-up anticipated to begin by 2026.

Read original articleLink Icon
America prepares for a new nuclear-arms race

The United States is bracing for a potential new nuclear arms race, with concerns rising over simultaneous threats from multiple adversaries. Pentagon officials are contemplating scenarios where Russia could attack a NATO member, China might seize the opportunity to invade Taiwan, and North Korea could launch an assault on South Korea, leading to three concurrent nuclear crises. This multifaceted threat landscape poses significant challenges for U.S. military strategy and preparedness. The anticipated build-up of nuclear capabilities could begin as early as 2026, reflecting a shift in focus from a singular nuclear threat to a more complex geopolitical environment. The implications of these developments are profound, as they could reshape U.S. defense policies and international relations in the coming years.

- The U.S. is preparing for a potential new nuclear arms race.

- Concerns are growing over simultaneous threats from Russia, China, and North Korea.

- The Pentagon is strategizing for multiple concurrent nuclear crises.

- A nuclear build-up could start as early as 2026.

- The evolving threat landscape may significantly impact U.S. defense policies.

Link Icon 8 comments
By @bradgessler - 8 months
This increases the likelihood of accidents and misinterpretations triggering a nuclear war, which is inevitable as long as these weapons exist.

The first bomb was detonated on July 16, 1945 and the world has successfully avoided incidents, accidents, etc. from spiraling out of control into a full-scale exchange for 79 years. Will this continue for 10 more months? 10 more years? 100 years or longer? Nobody knows, but the thing we do know is that there's a non-zero chance of the worst happening.

There's a book about incidents worth reading called "Command and Control": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Command_and_Control_(book) that's worth reading if you want to better understand the risks we're dealing with by having nuclear weapons.

By @whatnotests2 - 8 months
So much for build back better.

Always enough money for war and weapons, while the infrastructure, education, and health systems disintegrate.

By @slothtrop - 8 months
My read on the hypothetical described in the first paragraph is that a) an indefinite stalemate with Ukraine would defer this possibility to a time world circumstances will be different, b) trajectory of US industrial manufacturing expansion following CHIPS act will relegate Taiwan to medium importance and once in that position the US will not risk all-out-war to protect it, c) North Korea matters most if the former scenarios are in play, relations with China will still be cold without a war but they would not be keen to sanction NK aggression owing to potential response
By @VyseofArcadia - 8 months
I think the scenario laid out in the first paragraph would literally be World War III.
By @worstspotgain - 8 months
By @Log_out_ - 8 months
Everyone near a ex empire is currently scrambling for nukes.
By @1-6 - 8 months
All the nuclear power plants today are concentrated on the US east coast. Could it be a defensive posture against ICBMs flying from the Pacific Ocean?