August 19th, 2024

Tom Wolfe's Irresistible Snap, Crackle and Pop

Tom Wolfe transformed sociology into art with his unique writing style, exploring social dynamics and status, critiquing elite performative activism, and contrasting new cultural elites with old aristocracy.

Read original articleLink Icon
Tom Wolfe's Irresistible Snap, Crackle and Pop

Tom Wolfe, renowned for his distinctive writing style, transformed sociology into a form of art through his keen observations of social dynamics and status. His works, including "Radical Chic" and "The Right Stuff," explore the shifting status rules of society, particularly during the cultural upheavals of the 1970s. Wolfe's approach was characterized by a blend of audacity and insight, as he examined the behaviors and motivations of the elite, often highlighting their contradictions and the performative nature of their social interactions. He portrayed the new cultural elite, who had to navigate complex social landscapes, contrasting them with the old aristocracy that enjoyed a more secure status based on lineage. Wolfe's writing delved into the nuances of social dilemmas, capturing the essence of human behavior and the often superficial nature of social displays. His essays, particularly "Radical Chic," critique the performative aspects of social activism among the wealthy, questioning the authenticity of their engagement with marginalized communities. Wolfe's legacy lies in his ability to blend literary flair with sociological insight, making profound observations about modern life while maintaining a sense of empathy for his subjects.

- Tom Wolfe transformed sociology into art through his unique writing style and keen social observations.

- His works often explore the shifting status dynamics of society, particularly in the 1970s.

- Wolfe critiqued the performative nature of social activism among the elite, questioning their authenticity.

- He contrasted the new cultural elite with the old aristocracy, highlighting the complexities of social status.

- His legacy is marked by a blend of literary skill and sociological insight, capturing the essence of human behavior.

Link Icon 9 comments
By @fancyfredbot - 8 months
Tom Wolfe is an absolutely incredible author. Bonfire of the vanities in particular is an amazing read which the film adaptation only barely begins to do justice to. I also think that both A Man in Full and Back to Blood are amazing novels. The thing these books do is bring the fight for status into sharp focus while also remaining very true to life. After reading them you start to see it everywhere and it helps you to understand the actions people take in your own life. Highly recommended.
By @jdminhbg - 8 months
Radical Chic is available as a PDF from NY Magazine: https://nymag.com/docs/07/05/070529radical_chic.pdf

It's uncanny to read these in the context of the 2020s and see so many parallels.

By @woodruffw - 8 months
These two essays in TFA were published in a larger collection[1] by Wolfe, which I’d recommend. The essay on Marshall McLuhan in particular might be interesting to HN’s audience.

[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Pump_House_Gang

By @Triphibian - 8 months
I read The Right Stuff recently and it was a pleasure. Very full of life and colorful and he really was able to get at what made these test pilots and astronauts the tick.
By @brudgers - 8 months
By @_whiteCaps_ - 8 months
The TV adaptation of A Man In Full is out on Netflix now.

I first heard about the Stoic philosophy from that book.

By @didgeoridoo - 8 months
> There are certain writers you should never read before you yourself sit down to write, like P.G. Wodehouse and Tom Wolfe

Dave Barry, too.

By @cafard - 8 months
Let's step back a bit. Brooks mentions the Astors, Rockefellers, and Whitneys. The founder of the Astor fortunes was a butcher's son, and apparently John D. Rockefeller's father was nothing special. To quote Mrs. Archer in The Age of Innocence (https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/541/pg541.txt)

""" "Don't tell me," Mrs. Archer would say to her children, "all this modern newspaper rubbish about a New York aristocracy. If there is one, neither the Mingotts nor the Mansons belong to it; no, nor the Newlands or the Chiverses either. Our grandfathers and great-grandfathers were just respectable English or Dutch merchants, who came to the colonies to make their fortune, and stayed here because they did so well. One of your great-grandfathers signed the Declaration, and another was a general on Washington's staff, and received General Burgoyne's sword after the battle of Saratoga. These are things to be proud of, but they have nothing to do with rank or class. New York has always been a commercial community, and there are not more than three families in it who can claim an aristocratic origin in the real sense of the word." """

And was Leonard Bernstein admired for his taste? I should have said it was his conducting and composing. Was Barbara Walters admired for her taste, or for ability to interview people of some interest?

In general, I reached a point where I really could resist Wolfe's effects, where I was tired of the habitual elbow in my ribs. I would remark also that according to something posted now and then on HN, he got Yeager's crash in The Right Stuff wrong, and apparently also the fiasco with Grissom's capsule. On the other hand, Ken Kesey did speak well of him.

[edit: added "also" to the second-last sentence]

By @runnr_az - 8 months
Everyone who builds anything should read From Bauhaus to Our House.