An Interview with Robert Caro and Kurt Vonnegut (1999)
Robert Caro and Kurt Vonnegut discussed biography and political power, focusing on Caro's insights into Robert Moses and Lyndon Johnson, emphasizing the importance of understanding their personal histories and influences.
Read original articlethe interview with Robert Caro and Kurt Vonnegut unfolded as a dialogue about biography and the nature of political power. Caro, known for his extensive biographies of Robert Moses and Lyndon Johnson, explained that his approach to biography aims to illuminate the political forces shaping society rather than merely recounting the lives of famous individuals. He emphasized that Robert Moses, despite never being elected, wielded significant power in New York through public authorities, which had not been adequately explored in previous literature. Caro's realization of the need to understand the sources of Moses' power marked a turning point in his writing.
Vonnegut and Caro discussed the transformation of Moses from an idealist to a power broker, attributing this shift to his relationship with Al Smith, who became a crucial patron. They also touched on Lyndon Johnson's complex character, shaped by his early experiences and ambition, which coexisted with a genuine compassion for the underprivileged. Caro noted that while many biographies of Johnson existed, they often lacked depth and a sense of place, prompting him to seek firsthand accounts from those who knew Johnson in his youth. This exploration revealed discrepancies in the established narrative, suggesting that earlier biographies had overlooked significant aspects of Johnson's formative years. The conversation highlighted the intricate interplay between personal history and political power, showcasing Caro's commitment to uncovering the deeper truths behind his subjects.
Related
Don Quixote's Fried Eggs: Purpose of a System Is What It Does
The article delves into the concept of "the purpose of a system is what it does" from "Don Quixote," discussing policy contradictions in housing, unemployment benefits, and family policies. It contrasts San Francisco and Austin's housing approaches, addresses monopolies in the housing market, and explores ideological shifts in benefits and family policies post-recession. Personal interests influence public policy, echoing themes from Cervantes' novel.
Camus and Sartre split up over the question of how to be free
Albert Camus and Jean-Paul Sartre, once united in existentialism and justice, clashed over socialism and communism, sparking a public feud. Their split mirrored political tensions, questioning the trade-offs in pursuing justice and freedom.
When the CIA turned writers into operatives
The podcast "Not All Propaganda Is Art" explores Cold War writers unwittingly involved in C.I.A. propaganda efforts. Benjamen Walker sheds light on how cultural figures were manipulated for political ends.
The Phantoms Haunting History
The article examines the influence of pseudohistory on historical narratives, citing controversial theories by Freud, Velikovsky, and Illig. It underscores the ongoing struggle between evidence-based research and popular historical interpretations.
Nearly 7% of American newspaper employees now work at the New York Times
In an interview, Joe Kahn, New York Times' executive editor, addresses staff incentivization challenges amid internal and external pressures. He emphasizes supporting journalists tackling contentious topics and discusses his reporting experiences in Texas and China. Kahn also shares insights on his family's charitable giving.
It’s an excellent book to start with if you want to get an exposure to his way of working and his thinking.
One of my favorite insights, ever.
I also like the line in there or Vonnegut and Caro agree that 4 to 5 hours a day is the max you can truly focus.
Robert Caro and Kurt Vonnegut interview each other (1999) - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26018824 - Feb 2021 (46 comments)
So, it's relatively easy to find out that the US currently has about ~120 civilian firearms for every 100 people, but how does that number compare with whatever it was in 1999, when Vonnegut said the above?
Related
Don Quixote's Fried Eggs: Purpose of a System Is What It Does
The article delves into the concept of "the purpose of a system is what it does" from "Don Quixote," discussing policy contradictions in housing, unemployment benefits, and family policies. It contrasts San Francisco and Austin's housing approaches, addresses monopolies in the housing market, and explores ideological shifts in benefits and family policies post-recession. Personal interests influence public policy, echoing themes from Cervantes' novel.
Camus and Sartre split up over the question of how to be free
Albert Camus and Jean-Paul Sartre, once united in existentialism and justice, clashed over socialism and communism, sparking a public feud. Their split mirrored political tensions, questioning the trade-offs in pursuing justice and freedom.
When the CIA turned writers into operatives
The podcast "Not All Propaganda Is Art" explores Cold War writers unwittingly involved in C.I.A. propaganda efforts. Benjamen Walker sheds light on how cultural figures were manipulated for political ends.
The Phantoms Haunting History
The article examines the influence of pseudohistory on historical narratives, citing controversial theories by Freud, Velikovsky, and Illig. It underscores the ongoing struggle between evidence-based research and popular historical interpretations.
Nearly 7% of American newspaper employees now work at the New York Times
In an interview, Joe Kahn, New York Times' executive editor, addresses staff incentivization challenges amid internal and external pressures. He emphasizes supporting journalists tackling contentious topics and discusses his reporting experiences in Texas and China. Kahn also shares insights on his family's charitable giving.