People eating beef are less likely to live near the industry's pollution
Research from the University of Pittsburgh shows a disconnect between beef consumption and nitrogen pollution, with significant emissions linked to distant consumers. A holistic approach is needed to mitigate environmental impacts.
Read original articleResearch from the University of Pittsburgh has revealed that individuals who consume beef are often located far from the pollution generated by the beef industry, particularly nitrogen emissions. The study, published in Environmental Science & Technology, highlights a significant spatial disconnect between beef consumption and the environmental impacts of cattle farming. The researchers traced nitrogen losses along the U.S. beef supply chain at the county level, finding that beef consumption in one area can be linked to nitrogen losses in over 200 other counties. In 2017, beef consumption was responsible for approximately 1,330 gigagrams of nitrogen emissions, enough to fertilize 20% of all corn grown in the U.S. The study emphasizes the need for a holistic approach to address nitrogen pollution, suggesting that recovering nutrients from animal wastewater could mitigate environmental damage while providing farmers with reusable fertilizers. The findings indicate that consumers, especially those on the East Coast and in parts of California, Nevada, and Arizona, are often more than 600 miles away from the sources of nitrogen pollution associated with their beef consumption.
- Beef consumers are often distanced from the pollution caused by the beef industry.
- The study mapped nitrogen losses along the beef supply chain at the county level.
- Beef consumption in 2017 resulted in significant nitrogen emissions, impacting vast agricultural areas.
- Nutrient recovery from wastewater could help reduce nitrogen pollution.
- A holistic approach is necessary to address environmental impacts effectively.
Related
Eating meat with lower carbon footprint often means killing more animals
Consumers face trade-offs between animal welfare and environmental impact when choosing meats. Different livestock and farming methods offer varying compromises. Balancing personal values is crucial. Research on farming systems could help mitigate trade-offs.
Montana Has More Cows Than People. Why Are Locals Eating Beef from Brazil?
In Montana, a small percentage of locally consumed beef is produced in-state. Old Salt Co-op aims to disrupt this by vertically integrating operations, supporting local ranchers, and promoting sustainable practices.
Cutting farm nitrous oxide emissions helps climate and ozone layer
New research from the University of Sheffield suggests using special fertilizers and crushed basalt rocks can reduce agricultural nitrous oxide emissions by 25%, benefiting climate and ozone layer without additional costs.
Plan to cut overlooked methane emissions could help stop global warming faster
Researchers from Duke University stress the urgent need to address methane emissions, proposing a three-step plan to reduce them, coordinate efforts with carbon dioxide, and enforce abatement measures for climate benefits.
Something's Poisoning America's Farms. Scientists Fear 'Forever' Chemicals
Farmers in the U.S. are worried about PFAS contamination from sewage sludge used as fertilizer, leading to lawsuits, livestock deaths, and Maine's ban on sludge while the EPA studies the issue.
Related
Eating meat with lower carbon footprint often means killing more animals
Consumers face trade-offs between animal welfare and environmental impact when choosing meats. Different livestock and farming methods offer varying compromises. Balancing personal values is crucial. Research on farming systems could help mitigate trade-offs.
Montana Has More Cows Than People. Why Are Locals Eating Beef from Brazil?
In Montana, a small percentage of locally consumed beef is produced in-state. Old Salt Co-op aims to disrupt this by vertically integrating operations, supporting local ranchers, and promoting sustainable practices.
Cutting farm nitrous oxide emissions helps climate and ozone layer
New research from the University of Sheffield suggests using special fertilizers and crushed basalt rocks can reduce agricultural nitrous oxide emissions by 25%, benefiting climate and ozone layer without additional costs.
Plan to cut overlooked methane emissions could help stop global warming faster
Researchers from Duke University stress the urgent need to address methane emissions, proposing a three-step plan to reduce them, coordinate efforts with carbon dioxide, and enforce abatement measures for climate benefits.
Something's Poisoning America's Farms. Scientists Fear 'Forever' Chemicals
Farmers in the U.S. are worried about PFAS contamination from sewage sludge used as fertilizer, leading to lawsuits, livestock deaths, and Maine's ban on sludge while the EPA studies the issue.