Corporate surveillance technology is out of control

A recent report highlights the extensive and intrusive nature of corporate surveillance technologies that monitor employees both in and out of the workplace. Employers are increasingly using tools that track keystrokes, analyze communications, and monitor physical movements, often leading to the creation of AI-generated "risk scores" that assess employees' psychological states and personal lives. The report, authored by privacy researcher Wolfie Christl, emphasizes the need for limitations on such surveillance practices, arguing that while some monitoring is justified in sensitive roles, it should not be applied universally across all employees. Companies like Microsoft and Everfox (formerly Forcepoint) provide sophisticated monitoring solutions that can flag behaviors deemed risky, including personal communications that may indicate financial distress or intentions to leave the company. Public sentiment is shifting against these invasive practices, with a Pew Research survey revealing that many Americans oppose extensive monitoring of employee activities. In response to growing concerns, legislation such as the "Stop Spying Bosses Act" is being proposed to regulate workplace surveillance, requiring transparency from employers about monitoring practices and limiting data collection on sensitive personal matters. Advocates argue that employees deserve a respectful work environment free from constant surveillance.

- Corporate surveillance technologies are increasingly invasive, monitoring various aspects of employees' lives.

- AI-generated "risk scores" assess employees' psychological states based on their monitored activities.

- Public opposition to workplace surveillance is growing, particularly among younger workers.

- Proposed legislation aims to regulate corporate surveillance practices and enhance employee privacy.

- Companies like Microsoft and Everfox are at the forefront of developing these monitoring technologies.