September 18th, 2024

Larry Ellison's AI-Powered Surveillance Dystopia Is Already Here

Larry Ellison proposed an AI-powered surveillance system using body cameras and drones to monitor public behavior, raising concerns about privacy, effectiveness, and ethical implications regarding security versus individual rights.

Read original articleLink Icon
Larry Ellison's AI-Powered Surveillance Dystopia Is Already Here

Larry Ellison, CEO of Oracle, has proposed a comprehensive AI-powered surveillance system that would utilize various technologies, including body cameras, drones, and car cameras, to monitor public behavior continuously. He claims that this system would ensure accountability among police and citizens by recording all activities, thereby promoting better behavior. Ellison's vision includes AI monitoring of police body cameras, which would always be on, with the ability to record even during designated privacy breaks, accessible only through court orders. He argues that such surveillance could prevent incidents of police brutality and enhance public safety, particularly in schools. However, the implementation of similar technologies has raised significant concerns regarding privacy, bias, and effectiveness. Critics point out that existing surveillance technologies have not consistently improved safety and often lead to over-policing and misidentification, particularly affecting marginalized communities. Ellison's remarks highlight a growing trend towards increased surveillance in society, raising ethical questions about the balance between security and individual rights. The technologies he discusses are already in use, but their efficacy in reducing crime and ensuring accountability remains debatable.

- Larry Ellison proposes an AI-driven surveillance system to monitor public behavior.

- The system includes always-on body cameras and drones for real-time monitoring.

- Critics highlight privacy concerns and the ineffectiveness of existing surveillance technologies.

- There are significant ethical implications regarding the balance between security and individual rights.

- The technologies discussed are already in use but have not proven to consistently improve safety.

Link Icon 4 comments
By @potato3732842 - 7 months
Larry Ellison doesn't have to worry about being profiled as an easy mark to contribute toward some government enforcement worker's KPIs (which themselves are frequently the result of less than noble goals) or getting screwed as part of some higher level initiative to go hard on some thing so of course he sees no danger in this sort of thing.

Edit: Now that I think about it you can sub in entire demographics in place of "Larry Ellison" and the above statement still holds other than the usual error from using a broad brush.

By @acheong08 - 7 months
It might be worth it to just live in a less advanced country that isn’t capable of such advanced surveillance
By @ChrisArchitect - 7 months
Earlier:

Omnipresent AI cameras will ensure good behavior, says Larry Ellison

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41562750

By @gizajob - 7 months
Yet amazingly, crimes will still happen about as regularly.