September 25th, 2024

Fedi Is for Losers

The article examines the Fediverse's appeal to those leaving Twitter, highlighting its community spirit but criticizing its lack of strategic engagement with societal issues and activism compared to Twitter and Bluesky.

Read original articleLink Icon
Fedi Is for Losers

The article discusses the current state of the Fediverse, particularly in comparison to Twitter. It suggests that the Fediverse attracts individuals who have disengaged from mainstream platforms like Twitter, often due to a shared sense of loss regarding various societal issues such as climate change and class struggles. The author expresses concern that while the Fediverse embodies a do-it-yourself ethos and a sense of community, it lacks a strategic plan for effecting real change. The piece critiques the complacency within the Fediverse, arguing that it needs to evolve from a space of retreat to one that actively engages with the world and promotes meaningful discourse. The author acknowledges that Twitter, despite its flaws, remains a powerful tool for activism, while newer platforms like Bluesky may capture some of the old Twitter's energy. Ultimately, the article calls for a shift in mindset within the Fediverse to foster a more impactful community.

- The Fediverse is characterized by a do-it-yourself ethos and a sense of community among those who have left Twitter.

- There is a concern that the Fediverse lacks a strategic plan for engaging with societal issues and effecting change.

- The author critiques the complacency within the Fediverse, suggesting it needs to become more proactive.

- Twitter is still viewed as a powerful tool for activism, despite its flaws.

- Newer platforms like Bluesky may offer a revitalized approach to social discourse.

Link Icon 8 comments
By @jackdaniel - 4 months
Some of us are hanging out to interact with peers and to share cool hacks. Nothing to do with winning or losing; not all social interactions can be reduced to a psychological warfare.
By @tetris11 - 4 months
.. I've started to view people in two categories: those who want to have a discussion, and those who want to win a discussion.

The former group doesn't care about popularity, just the free exchange of ideas with the intent of forming a new understanding.

The latter group needs a stage and a megaphone, and measures the success of their beliefs by how many people they can get applauding, even if it's just a fraction of the entire audience.

I stay clear of the latter.

By @ZunarJ5 - 4 months
This guy doesn't understand the Fediverse.
By @deafpolygon - 4 months
There seems to be an influx of anti-fediverse style post/articles lately.

Is there a reason for this ?

By @Brian_K_White - 4 months
Fediverse is BBS's. I loved the entire time of BBS's, both consciously at the time and now in retrospect, somehow, despite there being no thought of it's general popularity or winning or whatever.

"Fork it" or "patches welcome" is not hacker for go fuck yourself. It can be, but that is up to the speaker in each specific instance, and if this article is how this person thinks then perhaps it often is when spoken to them.

By @Distilitron - 4 months
Exactly.
By @pwpwp - 4 months
> covid

I don't understand this part. The people who left X after Musk's takeover seem to be mostly people who were on the winning side of Covid, i.e. the side that used the state and media apparatus to coerce people to participate in a medical experiment.