November 21st, 2024

Launch HN: Fresco (YC F24) – AI Copilot for Construction Superintendents

Fresco is an AI tool that automates documentation for construction superintendents, generating reports during site walks. It integrates with project management software and costs about $1,000 per site monthly.

CuriosityOptimismConcern
Launch HN: Fresco (YC F24) – AI Copilot for Construction Superintendents

Fresco, developed by Arvind and Akhil, is an AI-driven tool designed to streamline documentation for construction superintendents. Superintendents, who play a crucial role on construction sites, often spend significant time documenting site progress through photos and reports, which can be tedious and time-consuming. Fresco aims to alleviate this burden by allowing superintendents to create reports and punch lists during their site walks using generative AI. By simply taking short videos with voiceovers or uploading photos, Fresco automatically generates notes, transcriptions, and action items, which can be easily shared with their teams. The service integrates with existing project management software, enhancing efficiency. Fresco operates on a subscription model, charging approximately $1,000 per site per month, with discounts available for longer commitments. The founders are also exploring potential applications of their technology in other sectors, such as commercial real estate. They invite feedback from individuals with construction experience to refine their offering.

- Fresco uses AI to automate documentation for construction superintendents.

- The tool allows for real-time report generation during site walks.

- It integrates with existing project management software for seamless workflow.

- The subscription model is priced at around $1,000 per site per month.

- The founders are considering expansion into other industries like commercial real estate.

AI: What people are saying
The comments on the article about Fresco highlight various perspectives on the AI tool's potential and challenges in the construction industry.
  • Several commenters express enthusiasm for the idea and its applicability in various industries, including logistics and civil engineering.
  • Concerns are raised about the AI's ability to accurately interpret building codes and workmanship quality due to a lack of comprehensive training data.
  • Recommendations are made for improving user experience through better UI/UX design to cater to less technical users.
  • Some users share personal experiences with documentation challenges in construction, indicating a need for such tools.
  • There are apprehensions regarding the reliability of generative AI in real-world applications, particularly about its tendency to produce inaccuracies or "hallucinations."
Link Icon 10 comments
By @neither_color - 5 months
This is a good idea but I hope you've got some secret training data that isn't available on the open web. I've been able to stump ChatGPT with simple "gotcha" national electrical code questions that a foreman wouldn't have a problem answering(e.g sizing a breaker for a heater depending on different situations). There are far fewer subreddits and forums dedicated to trade specialists and as a community they're more hostile to DIY-ers and will tell you "get someone licensed." They're also not the types to write detailed reports and case studies on what they did.

It's not that trades are super complicated in comparison to other fields like web development, it's that there's no GitHub, no source shared among all pros like "here's what I did and how I got it to work." Without a good stack overflow how does the AI judge the quality of workmanship in photos?

You are absolutely right, btw, about google drives and one drives and hundreds of photos and all that. My experience is in dealing with general contractors on smaller jobs, not supers on mega projects, but they have similar issues. Lots of sloppy back and forths and poor tracking of change orders, etc,

What Im trying to say, since I sort of rambled there, is that while processing and sorting and making punchlists is a good idea, I have doubts about AI's current ability to accurately spot code(as in building code, which unlike JavaScript varies by zip code) issues. Does the AI know that you dont have enough clearance at X or does that have to go into the recording?

By @rm_-rf_slash - 5 months
Looks neat! I don’t work in construction but I know folks in civil engineering. Are there applicabilities with Fresco you could see in that domain?
By @wallawe - 5 months
Solid idea, and best of luck.

If I could make one recommendation: hire a UX/UI designer ASAP. The less technical the audience, the more intuitive and easy to navigate the UI needs to be.

Our company focuses on home service businesses and they get roadblocked super easily. I think you'll be glad you did it earlier rather than later. Otherwise, the ux debt will pile up and it will be quite a project a year down the line.

By @justinzhou13 - 5 months
This is super cool and there’s a ton of other industries where this is sorely needed!
By @Closi - 5 months
FYI - this could be really useful in logistics operations and production too! (Which is my background, although I suspect the price point is unfortunately much too high for that application).
By @kyleli626 - 5 months
really cool application of LLMs to a big problem - nice work.
By @0_____0 - 5 months
I'm in the middle of a renovation project (not as a professional developer, just a random dipshit who wanted to make a multifam building a little nicer and bit off way too much)

Anyway, I've been running around compiling and recompiling photos and punchlists, and my reaction was "Coool!"

I'm not your target audience but I have to imagine the people that are would get utility out of this.

By @StephenSmith - 5 months
We make an AI camera for residential home builders. I'd love to chat to see if there's any synergy here.

bedrockwireless.com

Ping me, stephen [at] bedrockwireless.com

By @bambax - 5 months
With all due respect and while wishing you best of luck, it's always a bit worrisome when generative AI is used in the real world with real consequences...

In my experience, what LLMs, even some of the most advanced ones (o1, Gemini 1.5) are really good at is rationalization after the fact: explaining why they were right, even when presented with direct evidence to the contrary.

I just ran an experiment trying to get various models put footnote references in the OCR of a text, based on the content of the footnotes. I tested 120+ different models via OpenRouter; they all failed, but the "best" ones failed in a very bizarre and I think, dangerous way: they made up some text to better fit the footnote references! And then they lied about it, saying in a "summary" paragraph that no text had been changed, and/or that they had indeed been able to place all references.

So I guess my question is: how do you detect and flag hallucinations?