Writers condemn startup's plans to publish 8k books next year using AI
Writers and publishers criticize Spines for planning to publish 8,000 AI-generated books, charging authors fees, and raising concerns about quality and originality, despite claims of expedited publishing and retaining royalties.
Read original articleWriters and publishers are expressing strong criticism towards a startup named Spines, which plans to publish up to 8,000 books in the coming year using artificial intelligence. The company intends to charge authors between $1,200 and $5,000 for services such as proofreading, formatting, and distribution, all facilitated by AI. Critics argue that Spines is prioritizing profit over the quality of literature, with independent publisher Canongate labeling the initiative as lacking care for writing. Authors like Suyi Davies Okungbowa and Deidre J Owen have described Spines as opportunistic and akin to vanity publishing. Despite Spines claiming that authors will retain 100% of their royalties and that they are not a vanity publisher, concerns remain about the originality and quality of the content produced through AI. The Society of Authors has warned potential authors to be cautious about entering contracts that require them to pay for publication, suggesting that such routes are unlikely to fulfill their publishing aspirations. Spines asserts that its technology will expedite the publishing process to just two to three weeks, aiming to democratize access to publishing for aspiring authors. The company has recently raised $16 million in funding and aims to help one million authors publish their works.
- Spines plans to publish 8,000 books next year using AI, charging authors significant fees.
- Critics argue the initiative undermines the quality of literature and resembles vanity publishing.
- The Society of Authors advises caution for authors considering contracts with Spines.
- Spines claims to streamline the publishing process to two to three weeks.
- The startup has raised $16 million in funding to support its operations.
Related
Academics shocked after T&F sells access to their research to Microsoft AI
Academic authors express surprise as Taylor & Francis sells research access to Microsoft for £8m. Concerns arise over lack of transparency, author consultation, and compensation. Society of Authors stresses importance of rights protection.
Has your paper been used to train an AI model? Almost certainly
Academic publishers are selling research papers to AI firms, raising copyright concerns. Major deals include Taylor & Francis with Microsoft and Wiley with another company, prompting legal disputes and researcher frustrations.
AI stole my job and my work, and the boss didn't know – or care
A freelance writer lost his job to an AI at Cosmos Magazine, which used his work without consent. This incident raises concerns about transparency and the value of human authorship in journalism.
Drowning in Slop: AI Garbage Is Clogging the Internet, and It's Getting Worse
AI-generated content, termed "slop," is overwhelming the internet, degrading information quality across sectors like fiction, social media, and academia, raising concerns about trust and human creativity's marginalization.
'It gets more and more confused': can AI replace translators?
The adoption of AI in literary translation raises concerns about cultural sensitivity and nuance, though it may benefit minority language translations and gaming localization. Human translators remain essential for depth and artistry.
Publisher Spines will charge authors between $1,200 and $5,000 to have their books proofread, designed and distributed with the help of artificial intelligence
So it's not a new kind of scam publishing crappy books written by AI (at best retreads of existing books). It's automating the old scam of vanity presses.
And if they're being honest-ish about it, I'm OK with that. Vanity presses don't have to be scams. Tell people that nobody is going to buy your book. You'll get your handsomely-bound copies of your text, lightly edited because you were just going to fight them on editorial decisions anyway.
I'd be skeptical of how much they can help in distribution. Brick-and-mortar bookstores don't want your book. Maybe you can convince your local shop to stick a few copies with a "Local Author!" sign, but AI isn't going to help with that.
It wouldn't surprise me if some robo-editors could genuinely improve the vanity press quality. That says more about the existing quality of the vanity press than about how much I trust robo-editors.
Related
Academics shocked after T&F sells access to their research to Microsoft AI
Academic authors express surprise as Taylor & Francis sells research access to Microsoft for £8m. Concerns arise over lack of transparency, author consultation, and compensation. Society of Authors stresses importance of rights protection.
Has your paper been used to train an AI model? Almost certainly
Academic publishers are selling research papers to AI firms, raising copyright concerns. Major deals include Taylor & Francis with Microsoft and Wiley with another company, prompting legal disputes and researcher frustrations.
AI stole my job and my work, and the boss didn't know – or care
A freelance writer lost his job to an AI at Cosmos Magazine, which used his work without consent. This incident raises concerns about transparency and the value of human authorship in journalism.
Drowning in Slop: AI Garbage Is Clogging the Internet, and It's Getting Worse
AI-generated content, termed "slop," is overwhelming the internet, degrading information quality across sectors like fiction, social media, and academia, raising concerns about trust and human creativity's marginalization.
'It gets more and more confused': can AI replace translators?
The adoption of AI in literary translation raises concerns about cultural sensitivity and nuance, though it may benefit minority language translations and gaming localization. Human translators remain essential for depth and artistry.