Ryanair – when every page is a dark pattern
Ryanair faces criticism for using "dark patterns" on its website to boost profits. Tactics include default sign-ups, misdirection during booking, and deceptive button changes to push upsells. This manipulative strategy raises concerns about prioritizing profit over customer experience.
Read original articleRyanair has been criticized for employing manipulative techniques, known as "dark patterns," throughout its website to increase profits. These tactics include default sign-ups for promotional materials and misdirection techniques during the booking process to upsell customers on additional services. The airline strategically places prominent buttons to encourage accidental clicks and repeatedly presents upsell offers, sometimes changing the button color and title to deceive customers. This persistent approach aims to manipulate customers into making impulse purchases or accidentally clicking on offers. Ryanair's integration of dark patterns into its booking process raises concerns about deceptive practices and prioritizing profit over customer experience. The company's consistent use of these techniques highlights the importance of being cautious and attentive while navigating their website to avoid falling for these manipulative strategies.
Related
Show HN: SmokeScanner – Using cigarette price arbitrage to find free flights
SmokeScanner service compares duty-free cigarette prices on Ryanair flights to high street prices, highlighting potential savings of £96 at London Stansted Airport. Travelers can save money for flight tickets through cheaper cigarette purchases.
FTC finds 'dark patterns' used by a majority of subscription apps and websites
The FTC study reveals most subscription apps and websites employ manipulative "dark patterns" affecting user privacy and behavior. Findings prompt increased FTC scrutiny on consumer fraud amid ongoing industry deception concerns.
Majority of sites and apps use dark patterns in the marketing of subscriptions
A global internet sweep by ICPEN found 75.7% of traders' websites used dark patterns. The sweep involved 27 authorities from 26 countries, aiming to address consumer protection and privacy regulations overlap. Reports highlighted deceptive design techniques impacting consumer rights.
Collection of Dark Patterns and Unethical Design
The website showcases various dark patterns used in digital interfaces to deceive users, including confirmshaming and hidden costs. Examples from companies like Lyft and Microsoft illustrate manipulative tactics.
TradingView's Emotional Subscription Cancellation
TradingView's subscription cancellation criticized for dark patterns like urgency, misleading buttons, and guilt-inducing visuals. Psychological triggers used to influence decisions and create guilt. Users advised to recognize and avoid manipulative design tactics.
They then charge you to use an app to scan your ID, some ridiculously low amount like 60 cents. The transactions costs and the software maintenance on this integration must dwarf the actual revenue generated. But you need to do this for reasons, one of which apparently is that not doing it will add an even higher fee. This is nickel and diming by instinct rather than out of any rational thinking.
One side effect of all of these tacked-on fees and dark patterns is that the supposed perks lose any meaning. Everyone ends up paying for 'speedy boarding', so that the 'speedy boarding' actually takes longer than the people who board last. And even the 'speedy boarding' passengers won't be able to fit their bags on board.
I actively avoid (and told my SO to never book) Ryanair. None of the other low cost airlines are this bad. Literally Easyjet are easier to deal with. Easyjet also have dark patterns (literally, always look for the grey text..) but they don't go out of their way to make you suffer.
Also, how degrading is it for flight attendents to have to go around selling scratch cards? I'm sure Ryanair would have them go around selling fentanyl if it were up to corporate.
The 'not printing a boarding ticket' before you travel and being charged for it at the airport has been around since 2009: https://theguardian.com/money/2009/may/14/ryanair-online-che... so it's hard for people to feign ignorance of it.
One particularily devious example is when you log into WizzAir's website, the check box under the login (which takes your email and password) is not "Remember me", but rather "Subscribe me to marketing emails".
Always takes me a moment not to select it.
I'm sure they have lots of numbers showing it's worth it, but I can't help notice that companies who know they are good and you need them tend to have a much easier unsub path, frictionless for many. It doesn't inspire huge confidence and very much confirmed my wish to unsubscribe.
It might be because I got accustomed to it, but - while you indeed need to decline extra after extra - the overall process seems sufficiently clear and straightforward, and most of all both the website and the app are quick and bug-free (in my experience).
Other airline websites I've used in comparison are much much worse. Finnair, SAS, Swiss (Lufthansa), EasyJet, AirBaltic, LOT... much slower, clunkier, and buggier. (Again, in my experience.)
As for the actual experience of flying with them, of course it's not luxurious, and you need to accept that strictly enforcing their rules is how they can keep their prices down. So I'll go against the grain and say that I have no sympathy for the people that show up at the gate with two oversized bags and make a scene because they're asked to pay for them.
The internet feels like that. Our devices feel like that. Everything feels like that. It's as if the entire world is turning into a Marrakech bazaar with aggressive kiosk owners. We normalised treating users like marks for aggressive sales tactics.
As a teenager I worked at a box store, and I had to keep pushing extended warranties on threat of creative dismissal. I saw how disingenuous pitches changed the relationship with customers from trust-based to adversarial. If this upsell is bullshit, how trustworthy is the actual service?
When I went freelance, I practiced radical honesty, and it worked great. Once people accept that you're honest and on their side, they'll sign blank cheques. Trust is incredibly valuable in an increasingly trustless society.
As long as you pay attention and read the information given to you - and check in via the app - then it’s smooth sailing. The flights (on my route) are so cheap, that upgrading everything (best seats, priority boarding, fast track etc) is still about a third of the price sometimes of flying with other operators without any hand luggage.
They surely know what they're doing, so, do they literally have meetings openly discussing where to put buttons to trick people? Am I just naive in thinking that's insane?
I've used them loads of times and it's usually fine. Occasionally I get stung by something and extra charges like not checking in on time or misreading the baggage regs. Or changing my return date which is not really a dark pattern but often expensive. (sort of a dark pattern - the flights can be like £10 if you book ahead but if you need to delay your flight a day at the last minute you'll find they've gone to £200)
- They make it sound as if you _have_ to choose a seat (and pay for that choice), to avoid this you must find a tiny text link (not button) somewhere hidden on the page
- All the worst/most expensive options pre-selected for you
- Randomly changing the saliency of the options that give you choice between premium (additional fee) choices and free choices; so that you'll almost certainly accidentally include an add-on you didn't want
- Dynamic pricing that changes depending on whether you've seen the page before etc.
- Ridiculous baggage policies/completely opaque costs for additional luggage depending on where and when you decide to add it to your booking
- At the checkout page, the currency/payment UI is so broken that I regularly had to go into browser devtools and send requests by hand just so I could complete a booking. Also currency exchange scam.
- Clicking on "search" (or was it "book"?) automatically accepts their shitty terms and conditions for you even if you don't click on the checkbox, which is probably illegal
I'm sure there were much more.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hIw5WlBZ-ds
I tried every trick in the book, but in the end only dev console could save the day. It was a null reference exception on not buying a bundle...
- their country selector fails if it's not already set to the correct country. It is totally broken, as you might select something, and the result is another, or none at all. So sometimes it doesn't change the selection, at all, not until you've selected another random country first, after that it suddenly does respond to the needed country. This is enough to sometimes just give up.
But in fairness I always blame the folks from this site, and the sorry state of our profession! That's you folks, who have been corrupted to work for the highest bidder only, and never take out the trash! So we stand on an ever increasing pile of trash. Because as a collective we waste our time building, for example, linux, while it is an anachronistic piece of software, irrelevant. Shitware. We are quite autistic, as we place ourselves outside of society. We act like victims instead of citizens that work and wish for their environment to improve. Inevitably it doesn't appreciate us. It pushes the imposter syndrome.
- The seat becomes very uncomfortable over time. It seems the foam has degraded and lost its elasticity due to overuse. Bone on metal.
- There is no head rest for people that are above the median. So you see many, many people just giving up and resting their head on the seat in front of them.
But I like certain other things: no magazines, no security leaflets, no mess, the no nonsense execution.
The website is something I can solve myself, as they have not started to randomize the answers and the colors yet ;-)
All airlines have the same problems: the security theater, the over-crowding, the waiting, the air conditioning, the on-boarding, the lack of liquidity of the tickets (please let me sell the ticket or swap it). It's crap and Ryanair does at least as well as others. In fact I may even prefer dark patterns when the site works well otherwise.
In the US we have the same situation with Spirit and Frontier.
If you’re well-informed you can fly for an incredibly low price on low cost airlines.
These low cost airlines punish customers who cost the airline in their biggest costs like labor and fuel. And, yes, they upsell on unnecessary upgrades.
One person’s dark pattern is another person’s opportunity to save.
I once met a guy on a Spirit flight who was taking his first flight ever to visit family where he’d normally drive an incredibly long distance to get there, but because the flight was so affordable he could cut his travel time. I don’t think he cared that the website had dark patterns because he couldn’t fly on a traditional airline as it was cost-prohibitive.
The only positive of their site is that it actually works. I am always shocked that so many airline sites globally break, making it difficult to give them your money
Collection of Dark Patterns and Unethical Design - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40993389 - Jul 2024 (70 comments)
So, if you want a check-in bag, you pay almost 50% more than the "value" price, and if you want the same level of service as with "legacy" airlines (except "fast track through security"), you pay almost double?
Funny dark pattern that I found: When checking in on the app, they have copy&paste disabled. Hence, I need to enter booking code and email address manually. I next expect them to make the booking code longer (its only 6 characters), or reset when leaving the app, so that even more people fail at this task.
I find all airline bookings never work first time - usually three, four or five attempts are required.
RA bury deeply the option for automatic currency conversion at their extremely high rates, which is active by default.
On a third or so attempt to book, I managed to miss turning that off, and was accordingly ripped off, despite my explicit wish not for it happen.
If a company is actively, knowingly and willingly harming you, it's time to walk away.
One interesting ones that I was curious about ua the “infant fee”. Though I can’t see what exactly that is for.
Is that only if you want to put the infant in the overhead bin?
You can say "to increase its profits" about anything a company does. The problem with using dark patterns isn't the profit motive. The problem is it's coercing people through deception.
Though I think that last one was pretty ingenious — when they listed the price of the cheapest option as $78.76 but compared it to the markup of the other pricier options as $28.21, $37.81 etc.
it is a miracle that they are able to cope with high fuel prices and major airports feeling they are owed dollars for every dime made. but in the end it is just an illusion of low-cost. when the ticket's lowest far is 40 and you charge 46 for a cabin bag, might as well make the base fare 80 and call it a day?
Instead of showing you the total price for the return flight, they show you the price of the option on the cheapest leg of the flight. So for example, if an option cost $10 on the outbound flight, $15 inbound flight, instead of displaying $25 total or $12.5 on average, they display "From $10 per flight". You'd expect to pay $20 but end up paying $25.
EasyJet App is slop, the BA app is total shite.
The first time I used it, I paid in the airport for the boarding pass. When I complained that I never paid for in other airline companies, I was told I did not have to pay for it if I read the email they sent me to print it 2 hours in advance.
But I received tons of emails from Ryanair every week before the flight. Advertisement emails which, at some point, I got tired of and stopped reading them: that's how I missed the email in which they asked me to print the boarding pass.
Not to mention that the paragraph in which they mentioned the boarding pass was itself a small portion of a larger advertisement email I still keep in my email inbox.
I hope we will soon get over this nonsense and enjoy a shared understanding that people are terrible at making decisions.
I'm not expecting the UX designers to lead the way here. Education perhaps? Better role models?
Related
Show HN: SmokeScanner – Using cigarette price arbitrage to find free flights
SmokeScanner service compares duty-free cigarette prices on Ryanair flights to high street prices, highlighting potential savings of £96 at London Stansted Airport. Travelers can save money for flight tickets through cheaper cigarette purchases.
FTC finds 'dark patterns' used by a majority of subscription apps and websites
The FTC study reveals most subscription apps and websites employ manipulative "dark patterns" affecting user privacy and behavior. Findings prompt increased FTC scrutiny on consumer fraud amid ongoing industry deception concerns.
Majority of sites and apps use dark patterns in the marketing of subscriptions
A global internet sweep by ICPEN found 75.7% of traders' websites used dark patterns. The sweep involved 27 authorities from 26 countries, aiming to address consumer protection and privacy regulations overlap. Reports highlighted deceptive design techniques impacting consumer rights.
Collection of Dark Patterns and Unethical Design
The website showcases various dark patterns used in digital interfaces to deceive users, including confirmshaming and hidden costs. Examples from companies like Lyft and Microsoft illustrate manipulative tactics.
TradingView's Emotional Subscription Cancellation
TradingView's subscription cancellation criticized for dark patterns like urgency, misleading buttons, and guilt-inducing visuals. Psychological triggers used to influence decisions and create guilt. Users advised to recognize and avoid manipulative design tactics.