July 23rd, 2024

Congress Wants to Let Private Companies Own the Law

Congress is considering the Pro Codes Act to allow private companies to own law aspects through copyright. Critics fear limited public access and transparency, while supporters argue for enhanced online availability.

Read original articleLink Icon
Congress Wants to Let Private Companies Own the Law

Congress is considering the Pro Codes Act, a bipartisan effort to allow private companies to own aspects of the law through copyright. This bill, proposed as an amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act, aims to protect technical standards developed by private organizations, which are often referenced in laws. Critics argue that incorporating these standards by reference should make them public domain to ensure the law remains accessible to all. The bill's supporters claim that making standards available online for free enhances public access, but opponents argue that this approach still restricts access to the law to a single source. The issue of private ownership of the law has sparked controversy, with concerns raised about transparency and public access. Critics view this move as an attempt to privatize legal standards and limit public understanding of the law.

Related

Lawyers' Committee Opposes New Draft of American Privacy Rights Act

Lawyers' Committee Opposes New Draft of American Privacy Rights Act

The Lawyers' Committee opposes the new draft of the American Privacy Rights Act for lacking civil rights protections and AI impact assessments. They stress the need for comprehensive privacy legislation prioritizing civil rights.

Surprise the Latest 'Comprehensive' US Privacy Bill Is Doomed

Surprise the Latest 'Comprehensive' US Privacy Bill Is Doomed

The American Privacy Rights Act (APRA), a bill aiming to establish a federal consumer privacy framework, faced opposition and was pulled from a hearing. Stripped of civil rights protections, its fate remains uncertain.

OpenAI pleads it can't make money with o using copyrighted material for free

OpenAI pleads it can't make money with o using copyrighted material for free

OpenAI requests British Parliament to permit copyrighted material for AI training. Facing legal challenges from NYT and Authors Guild for alleged copyright infringement. Debate impacts AI development and copyright protection, raising concerns for content creators.

Copied Act would make removing AI digital watermarks illegal

Copied Act would make removing AI digital watermarks illegal

The COPIED Act aims to protect creators by regulating AI-generated content through authentication standards and legal repercussions for unauthorized use, garnering support from industry groups for transparency and accountability.

Open Source in Europe: Facing the regulatory challenge

Open Source in Europe: Facing the regulatory challenge

The Cyber Resilience Act in Europe sets strict security standards for digital products, impacting the Open Source community. Experts discuss compliance challenges and initiatives to support businesses navigating regulations. Open Source faces coordination needs for better engagement in standardization processes.

Link Icon 12 comments
By @teachmetolearn - 7 months
Absolutely bonkers, how much did the lobbyists get paid to push this in?

Isnt there any more pressing concerns in this country?

The companies making the laws were able to figure out how to make money until now why do they need more protection?

By @patrickhogan1 - 7 months
This is incompatible with the Rule of Law. Anyone who thinks about this from first principles will conclude that all laws must be public and are not subject to copyright.
By @ajhurliman - 7 months
Every attempt I’ve made to interact with Lexis Nexis has been a nightmare.

Honestly though, what does a publisher of laws do these days? Couldn’t the government just say “actually we’re gonna take over publishing”, throw the PDF in S3 and call it a day?

By @two_handfuls - 7 months
That’s insane
By @krunck - 7 months
So there will be a day were I can fire up my favorite bittorrent client and illegally allow others to obtain copies of US law? Bring. It. On.
By @g-b-r - 7 months
Well, the US have also actually secret law...
By @2OEH8eoCRo0 - 7 months
Good. Maybe it'll bring a much needed reckoning for copyright law.
By @black6 - 7 months
> But that’s missing the point. It still means that the law itself is only available from one source, in one format. And while it has to be “publicly accessible online at no monetary cost,” that does not mean that it has to be publicly accessible in an easy or useful manner. It does not mean that there won’t be limitations on access or usage.

Let's not put the cart before the horse, here. As long as it's freely available, it'll be shared and shared alike by those who DGAF. I'm thinking of the type of people who hosted fake vax check-in websites during peak COVID inanity.

By @rurban - 7 months
ISO already does this. Looks like they want ISO competitors.

Now you want to improve the standard. Let's create another competing one. => xkcd

Insane

By @hulitu - 7 months
> Congress Wants to Let Private Companies Own the Law

But they already do. /s