July 27th, 2024

How the EU Weaponizes Regulation to Extract Billions from American Tech

The EU is imposing fines on American tech firms, including potential daily penalties on X for violating the Digital Services Act, amid broader regulatory efforts affecting companies like Meta and Amazon.

Read original articleLink Icon
How the EU Weaponizes Regulation to Extract Billions from American Tech

The European Union (EU) has increasingly utilized regulations to impose significant financial penalties on American tech companies, aiming to bolster its economy. Recently, European Commissioner Thierry Breton announced potential daily fines on X (formerly Twitter) for allegedly misleading users regarding its blue check verification system, claiming it violated the EU's Digital Services Act (DSA). This follows a trend where the EU has levied numerous fines, totaling billions of euros, on U.S. tech firms for non-compliance with various regulations, including the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the Digital Markets Act (DMA). The fines can reach up to 10% of a company's global revenue, severely impacting profit margins essential for research and development.

The DSA and DMA specifically target major American companies, with the DMA applying to six "gatekeepers" like Alphabet and Apple, while the DSA focuses on platforms with over 45 million monthly users. The EU's regulatory framework has led to substantial fines, with Meta, Amazon, and Google among the most affected. Compliance costs are also significant, with estimates suggesting U.S. digital service providers may incur up to $50 billion in new operational costs due to these regulations. Critics argue that these measures do not necessarily benefit European consumers or developers, as they may stifle innovation and drive American companies away from the European market, ultimately benefiting EU regulators financially.

Related

Apple is first company charged with violating EU's DMA rules

Apple is first company charged with violating EU's DMA rules

Apple is the first company charged under the EU's Digital Markets Act for App Store policies hindering competition. Investigations focus on fees, alternative app stores, and compliance changes. EU aims to prevent anti-competitive practices.

EU accuses Elon Musk's X of deceptive practices over blue 'checkmark'

EU accuses Elon Musk's X of deceptive practices over blue 'checkmark'

The European Union accuses Elon Musk's X of deceptive practices by allowing users to buy blue checkmarks, breaching the Digital Services Act. X faces fines up to 6% of turnover for non-compliance.

Elon Musk's X faces big EU fines as paid checkmarks are ruled deceptive

Elon Musk's X faces big EU fines as paid checkmarks are ruled deceptive

Elon Musk's social media platform, X, faces potential fines from the EU for deceptive practices regarding its verification system. Allegations include misleading users with paid checkmarks and lack of transparency.

EU warns X it may face fines for 'deceptive' blue-tick system

EU warns X it may face fines for 'deceptive' blue-tick system

The European Commission warns Elon Musk's platform, X, of potential fines for deceptive blue-tick system violating Digital Services Act. Breaches include misleading users, data restrictions, and inadequate advertising. Commission investigates further.

EU says X's blue tick accounts deceive users

EU says X's blue tick accounts deceive users

The European Union accuses Elon Musk's X platform of breaching content rules with a paid verification system. Investigations under the Digital Services Act may lead to fines and operational changes. Musk criticizes the DSA, while X defends its verification process. EU aims for a safe online environment.

Link Icon 6 comments
By @actuallyalys - 3 months
> The EU often imposes fines mere weeks or days after compliance deadlines pass, suggesting this kind of extraction is a feature, not a bug, of the regulatory regime.

This argument is strange to me. If a local road changes its speed limit and on the same day the new limit takes effect, I get pulled over for driving too fast, that seems expected?

I guess I could see the argument that the companies don’t have enough time to make the necessary changes to adhere to the law, but then you should be advocating for the law taking effect at a later date rather than regulators being slow to issue fines when they are in full effect.

By @hunglee2 - 3 months
Extra territoriality is well established in international law - if you provide services to, or extract data from the EU, you are subject to EU laws. US tech will simply have to comply or withdraw services.
By @pestatije - 3 months
Its give and take: we could make the statement "american tech weaponizes tax discrepancies to extract billions from EU countries"
By @markus92 - 3 months
Some of the big tech mentioned are fined a lot heavier than others on some of those regulations. For example, Apple has barely received anything under the GDPR. Why? They don't collect unnecessary user data with shady "consent". Microsoft also doesn't seem to be struggling too much with the DMA or DSA, just the usual anti-trust stuff they always seem to get themselves in. But their gatekeeper obligations don't seem to be a problem whatsoever.

The EU has been clear for years they're fed up with the behavior of big tech with some of those things. If you don't want to listen, you have to feel the consequences. Easy as that.

By @lofaszvanitt - 3 months
Previously on Earth about trampling on privacy:

........

By @robotmonsters - 3 months
"vague, ever-shifting rules" seems a bit disingenuous.

I can understand GDPR (and I'm no lawyer) but the whole of 'American Tech' can't?