Epic vs. Google judge says he'll 'tear the barriers down' on Google's app store
Judge Donato is set to rule on remedies for Google's app store monopoly, emphasizing competition and accountability, while Epic Games seeks to allow rival app stores within Google Play.
Read original articleJudge James Donato has indicated a strong stance against Google's monopoly in the Android app store, following a federal jury's unanimous decision that deemed it illegal. In a recent hearing, Donato emphasized the need to dismantle barriers that prevent competition, stating, "We’re going to tear the barriers down." He is set to issue a final ruling in the coming weeks, which will determine the extent of changes Google must implement. Epic Games, the plaintiff, is advocating for the integration of rival app stores within Google Play, allowing users to choose between Google and other platforms. Both parties acknowledged that opening the Play Store is feasible, but they disagreed on the timeline and costs involved. Google raised concerns about the potential for inappropriate content from rival stores, while Epic argued that any review process would give Google undue control. Donato plans to establish a compliance committee to oversee the implementation of the ruling, ensuring that Google does not engage in discriminatory practices against competing app stores. He reiterated the need for accountability, stating, "When you have a mountain that’s built out of bad conduct, you have to move that mountain."
- Judge Donato is expected to rule on remedies for Google's app store monopoly soon.
- Epic Games seeks to allow rival app stores within Google Play for user choice.
- Both parties agree on the feasibility of opening the Play Store but differ on implementation details.
- Donato plans to create a compliance committee to monitor Google's adherence to the ruling.
- The judge aims to prevent Google from exercising gatekeeping authority over rival app stores.
Related
Google begs court for relief from Epic Games' Play Store demands
Google resists Epic Games' Play Store changes in court, citing high costs and security risks. Epic seeks third-party store access, porting support, and Google Play distribution. Ongoing legal battle over alleged Google Play monopoly.
Apple first rejected, then quickly approved, Epic's app store in Europe
Epic Games challenges Apple's rejection of its European game store launch, involving the European Commission. The dispute, part of a broader regulatory feud, centers on Apple's 30% in-app purchase cut. EU regulators investigate Apple, Google, and Meta for DMA non-compliance.
FTC Outlines Concerns After Jury Finds Google Illegally Monopolized App Store
The FTC filed an amicus brief in the Epic Games v. Google antitrust case, advocating for remedies to restore competition and prevent Google from benefiting from its monopolistic practices.
U.S. Said to Consider a Breakup of Google
The U.S. Justice Department is exploring remedies for Google's search monopoly after an antitrust ruling, including potential breakups and data sharing, with a hearing set for September 6.
Judge tells Google: Play Store shakeup coming; punishment for running a monopoly
A federal judge will mandate significant changes to Google's Android app store after ruling it an illegal monopoly, allowing alternative app stores and potentially disrupting Google's control over app distribution.
Very cool!!
Seems like there's some restrictions especially around storage size (50mb) and push. But it's technically possible again. https://www.mobiloud.com/blog/progressive-web-apps-ios
I choose Android over iOS precisely because there aren't barriers to installing whatever I want. I give up a lot of creature comforts and integrations that iOS users take for granted in order to be a part of an ecosystem where I can count on always being able to install apps that I write for my own use without getting approval from a gatekeeper.
And yet, here we are, with Apple getting a free pass from the US court system because they were completely locked down, while Google's systems get ripped open by a court because they were open enough that they could be anti-competitive.
I worry that decisions like this will backfire horribly—that they'll create an environment where something like Android can never happen again, because no company can take the risk of accidentally creating a market that they might be deemed to monopolize later.
Related
Google begs court for relief from Epic Games' Play Store demands
Google resists Epic Games' Play Store changes in court, citing high costs and security risks. Epic seeks third-party store access, porting support, and Google Play distribution. Ongoing legal battle over alleged Google Play monopoly.
Apple first rejected, then quickly approved, Epic's app store in Europe
Epic Games challenges Apple's rejection of its European game store launch, involving the European Commission. The dispute, part of a broader regulatory feud, centers on Apple's 30% in-app purchase cut. EU regulators investigate Apple, Google, and Meta for DMA non-compliance.
FTC Outlines Concerns After Jury Finds Google Illegally Monopolized App Store
The FTC filed an amicus brief in the Epic Games v. Google antitrust case, advocating for remedies to restore competition and prevent Google from benefiting from its monopolistic practices.
U.S. Said to Consider a Breakup of Google
The U.S. Justice Department is exploring remedies for Google's search monopoly after an antitrust ruling, including potential breakups and data sharing, with a hearing set for September 6.
Judge tells Google: Play Store shakeup coming; punishment for running a monopoly
A federal judge will mandate significant changes to Google's Android app store after ruling it an illegal monopoly, allowing alternative app stores and potentially disrupting Google's control over app distribution.